Bus Rapid Transit Testimony
BRT Testimony Montgomery
County Council
Good
evening. My name is Jordan Cooper and I have come before you tonight to testify
in favor of a limited implementation of the proposed Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) routes
as described in the Functional Master Plan. My testimony represents my views
only as a Democratic Candidate for Delegate of District 16 and should not be
construed to represent the views of any other party, group, or organization
with which I may otherwise be affiliated. Given my interest in and knowledge of
the southwestern region of Montgomery County that comprises District 16, I will
restrict my comments to the three (3) proposed BRT corridors that are within
District 16: Corridors 3 & 4: MD
355 North and South, respectively, which I support
with amendments, and Corridor 6:
North Bethesda Transitway, which I fully
support as proposed.
I
will preface my remarks with a statement that it has become clear that the
maintenance of our current transportation infrastructure, being necessary, is no
longer sufficient to address the needs of our growing and diverse population.
I
recommend that BRT in Corridors 3 & 4 be initially introduced to our
community on a somewhat limited scale. The limited implementation of BRT will chiefly
provide four (4) benefits, including:
1)
Limiting the fiscal impact of this investment in
our transportation infrastructure;
2)
Serving as a proof of concept to our community;
3)
Focusing this investment on those areas of our
community that stand to gain the greatest benefits from BRT; and
4)
Minimizing the impact of BRT on Rt. 355 traffic
patterns.
I
urge the Council to support BRT lines along Corridors 3 & 4 only as far
south as the proposed new South Entrance to the Bethesda Metro Station. There
are five (5) reasons for my opposition to implanting BRT south of the Bethesda
Metro station:
1)
Residents in the Somerset and Chevy Chase West
communities along the 1.3 mile long “Green Mile” between Bradley Blvd. and
Western Ave. currently enjoy adequate access to both the Bethesda and
Friendship Heights Metro Stations, and the proposed BRT line not only isn’t
needed, but in its current iteration does not offer an additional stop along
this stretch of road, making the BRT on this stretch of Wisconsin Ave. duplicative
of Metro’s Red Line.
2)
Limiting the BRT from extending beyond the new
South Entrance of the Bethesda Metro Station will prevent the repurposing of
two curb lanes along the Green Mile from vehicle travel lanes to dedicated BRT
lane and will furthermore avoid an unnecessary transition to curb side lanes.
3)
This plan will allow BRT riders to connect to
the proposed above-ground Purple Line light rail, Metro’s underground heavy
rail Red Line, Capital Bikeshare stations, and WMATA buses at the new Southern
Entrance to Bethesda Metro Station, thus creating a multi-modal transit-node.
4)
With few businesses, low population density, and
no stops along the proposed 1.3 mile route between Bradley Blvd. and Western
Ave., BRT would largely be unable to either promote economic development or
remove cars from the road.
5)
Barring the extension of the BRT line into DC, which
would require the future approval of the D.C. City Council, there seems to be
scant logic to support the extension of a BRT line down to the Friendship
Heights Metro Station.
Given
the current circumstances facing our community today, there is insufficient
evidence to warrant the extension of the BRT south of Bradley Blvd.
Thank
you for your audience this evening. I urge you to support the construction of a
BRT line along Wisconsin Ave./Rockville Pike beginning at the proposed Southern
Entrance to the Bethesda Metro Station and extending North towards Rockville.